bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#22789: 25.1.50; In last master build https connections stop working


From: Alain Schneble
Subject: bug#22789: 25.1.50; In last master build https connections stop working
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:03:58 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Alain Schneble <a.s@realize.ch>
>> CC: <larsi@gnus.org>, <j_l_domenech@yahoo.com>, <22789@debbugs.gnu.org>
>> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 18:20:20 +0100
>> 
>> >>   Could it be a multi-threading issue then?  Multiple threads
>> >>   accessing the same socket...
>> >
>> > Not sure I follow -- are you trying to explain why ioctlsocket doesn't
>> > fail as expected, or are you trying to explain some other phenomenon?
>> 
>> Both.  1) I expected it to (sometime) fail but didn't see it.  2) The
>> arbitrary gnutls_handshake failures I observed seem like the socket's
>> state is getting corrupted.
>
> I cannot argue with facts.  I'm not sure the ioctlsocket calls are
> what causes the failures, but since you say the failures disappear
> when we don't, it's a fact that we should accept.

Neither do I.  Yes, the failures disappear completely.

>> Do you agree that WSAEventSelect is called from the reader thread and
>> the ioctlsocket is called from the main thread?
>
> Yes, of course.
>
>> And AFAIK, these functions are not thread safe...
>
> I don't think this is true.  AFAIK, the WSA* functions are all
> thread-safe.

Hm, it seems you are right, but I was not able to quickly find a *clear*
statement about this on MSDN...

>> So I suspect that we ran into a multi-threading issue here, which
>> corrupted the socket.  And may have lead to the above mentioned
>> issues.
>
> It's possible.  But if you see the problems solved after the change, I
> see no reason to continue arguing.

Yes, it solves the problems.  (Nevertheless, it would have been nice if
somebody else were able to reproduce the failures...)

Thanks.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]