bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#19081: 24.4.50; Input method polish-slash should not use keyboard tr


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#19081: 24.4.50; Input method polish-slash should not use keyboard translation
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:14 +0200

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:00:28 +1100
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> Magnus Henoch <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > The input method polish-slash is the only input method in latin-pre.el
> > that passes t as the KBD-TRANSLATE argument to quail-define-package.  I
> > think it shouldn't do that, because it doesn't represent an alternative
> > keyboard layout; it's just a thin layer over whatever keyboard layout is
> > currently in use.
> >
> > This patch changes the KBD-TRANSLATE argument to nil:
> >
> > diff --git a/lisp/leim/quail/latin-pre.el b/lisp/leim/quail/latin-pre.el
> > index 6202b89..b3a7591 100644
> > --- a/lisp/leim/quail/latin-pre.el
> > +++ b/lisp/leim/quail/latin-pre.el
> > @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ Key translation rules are:
> >   "polish-slash" "Polish" "PL>" nil
> >   "Polish diacritics and slash character are input as 
> > `/[acelnosxzACELNOSXZ/]'.
> >  For example, the character named `aogonek' is obtained by `/a'."
> > - nil t t t nil nil nil nil nil nil t)
> > + nil t t nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t)
> 
> I think this sounds reasonable, but I'm not familiar with the quail
> functions at all.  Could somebody have a peek at this?

I hope Handa-san (CC'ed) could comment on this.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]