|
From: | Ken Brown |
Subject: | bug#20843: 24.5; Profiler error: "Invalid sampling interval" |
Date: | Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:30:40 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
On 6/22/2015 2:50 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:04:50 -0400 From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu> CC: sva-news@mygooglest.com, 20843@debbugs.gnu.orgLooks fine, but perhaps it would be cleaner to return the actual message string or some distinctive code from setup_cpu_timer. This would avoid the need for a global variable.Is this better?Yes, thanks.
Pushed as commit dc30fb92. I'm not closing the bug yet, because I still want to follow up on your suggestion about reusing the w32 code.
Ken
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |