bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering

[Matthew Carter]

Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> writes:

>>>>>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:
>
>  >> It specifies black letters, but it's a bug to blindly obey that.
>
>  > Unless it specified this color specifically because it wanted the
>  > text to be invisible.
>
>       Except that the user should be free to override that.
>
>       The “major” browsers already allow that, e. g., via the Stylish
>       extension (see [1, 2]), and I believe that EWW should re-use
>       their approach; namely: a. support proper CSS cascading;
>       b. allow for custom (user-defined) styles.
>
>       That being said, being myself a user of EWW on a 16-color
>       Linux tty, I don’t see much value in trying to render
>       HTML-specified colors, anyway.  I’ve just disabled the feature
>       over a year ago, – and never wanted it back.
>
> [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stylish/
> [2] https://userstyles.org/

Is there a way to disable background colors while leaving font colors
in-tact?  I hate having the background colored (either the full screen
or behind text), but a little color on the words is nice in my opinion
(I use a 256 color tty).

-- 
Matthew Carter (m@ahungry.com)
http://ahungry.com