[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g' |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:51:44 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: 18331@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > FWIW, I can't reproduce on GNU Emacs 24.4.50.3 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+
> > Version 3.10.8) of 2014-08-26.
>
> Hopefully someone else will try with MS Windows or other platforms.
>
> For me (on Windows) it is 100% reproducible on all of the builds
> I mentioned.
I do see it, but only after evaluating that strange form. If I don't
evaluate it, "C-h k" woks as expected.
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/25
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Nicolas Richard, 2014/08/26
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/26
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g',
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/26
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Drew Adams, 2014/08/27
- bug#18331: 24.4.50; REGRESSION, no `C-h k' for `C-g', Glenn Morris, 2014/08/27