[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input metho
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method
Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:12:18 +0300
> From: Daimrod <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:38:29 +0900
> >> > FWIW, it strikes me that "C-q _" is less typing.
> >> It's not consistent and it doesn't really save typing:
> >> - "SPC _ _"
> >> - "SPC C-q _"
> > I meant "SPC SPC DEL _". As for "SPC _ _", it's of the same length,
> > so it doesn't save typing, either.
> It wasn't clear in my initial message so it's my fault. In my patch, I
> update the latin-postfix input-method so that one can type "SPC _ _"
> instead of "SPC SPC DEL _".
> Though I agree that it doesn't save typing compared to the method you
> proposed, my approach saves typing compared to the current method and I
> find my method faster to type because it's consistent with the other
> combinations and it doesn't "break the flow".
I don't necessarily object to the change, I just wanted to point out
that alternatives better than "SPC SPC DEL _" do exist.
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, K. Handa, 2014/07/24