|
| From: | Stefan Monnier |
| Subject: | bug#17625: 24.4.50; All installed packages marked "unsigned", no archive listed |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:21:47 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
> 1- why have `package-desc-signed' (and the foo.signed files)? I don't
> think APT has such a feature and I'm wondering what would be
> the interest. In any case given that all packages installed so far
> are not signed, the `list-packages' currently shouldn't scream
> "unsigned" since it's the normal expected case.
I just installed a patch which keeps the foo.signed infrastructure but
disables the "unsigned" mention in list-packages.
Stefan
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |