[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#17814: 24.3.91; better string manipulation in subr-x
From: |
Shigeru Fukaya |
Subject: |
bug#17814: 24.3.91; better string manipulation in subr-x |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:10:30 +0900 |
Some string manipulation functions in subr-x have room to optimize.
string-trim-left, string-trim-right -- use `substring' and
`match-beginning/end' instead of `replace-match'. The formers have
bytecodes and the latter not.
string-trim -- call string-trim-left first would be cost effective.
But, to change the code to trim both sides of the string at once might
be better.
string-remove-suffix -- change the last argument of substring will
shorten the code.
I change the string-trim defined using defun from defsubst, as its
string literal is somewhat big (Actually I suspect most of other
functions would also be better if defined by defun).
Regards,
Shigeru
subr-x.diff
Description: Binary data
- bug#17814: 24.3.91; better string manipulation in subr-x,
Shigeru Fukaya <=