[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set |
Date: |
Fri, 23 May 2014 20:37:48 +0300 |
> From: Ken Olum <kdo@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>
> Cc: 17560@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:50:59 -0400
>
> I'd put
>
> (if (not count) (setq count 1))
>
> in rmail-delete-forward and for consistency make the argument of
> rmail-delete-backward optional and add the same code there.
>
> Unfortunately, that is not consistent with rmail-next-message, for
> example. The alternative would be to make the argument not optional and
> change all callers to say (rmail-delete-forward 1).
The alternative is what I had in mind, yes.
> Unfortunately, in previous versions of emacs this would mean to move
> backward, so new calls would be incompatible with the old
> definition, which I think argues against this plan.
I don't think this problem should bother us, as the change in
rmail-delete-forward is backward-incompatible anyway. Which reminds
me: could you also make a suitable entry in NEWS?
TIA
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/23
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/24
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Ken Olum, 2014/05/27
- bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/30