bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt

[Glenn Morris]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> (Why does this deserve a discussion?  A few messages bounced, so
> what?)

OK, fine, keep confusing everyone who replies to you.

> If you ask me, this all stems from the fact that debbugs is less
> helpful than it could have been.  It could, for example, be smarter
> about merging, and it could take commands from messages addressed to
> NNNN@debbugs.gnu.org, not just control@.  If you want to solve these
> problems, that's the only sure way.

I disagree, and since no-one but me does any work on debbugs.gnu.org, I
would not expect anything to happen in this area.