[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16156: 24.3.50;
|
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
|
Subject: |
bug#16156: 24.3.50; |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:06:43 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
tin/1.9.6-20101126 ("Burnside") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/8.4-RELEASE (amd64)) |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
> In text mode, if the buffer contains
> -----------------------------------------
> foo
> bar
> -----------------------------------------
> and point is at the start of the second line, and I type RET,
> it gives
> -----------------------------------------
> foo
> bar
> -----------------------------------------
> This is clearly wrong.
RET is bound to `newline'. `newline' now indents the new line created,
under certain arcane conditions which hold by default.
C-j is bound to `electric-indent-just-newline'. This command doesn't
indent the new line created.
I also think this is not the right thing to do.
> --
> Dr Richard Stallman
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).