|
From: | Nathan Trapuzzano |
Subject: | bug#15814: 24.3.50; Signal error on malformed bindings in `cl-symbol-macrolet' (patch) |
Date: | Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:40:10 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes: > Now that I think about it, maybe an alternative for the "let format > checks" is to keep them in bytecomp.el and change cconv so that the > problems are *preserved* (and hence later detected by bytecomp). I thought the point of moving them to macroexp was so the checks happen even when we're not compiling.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |