[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:35:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Of course, this is technically possible. <IMHO> But I don't see
> a reason for this at all. Unlike 0 (zero) for arithmetic, "" for
> string operations, () (or nil) for lists, etc., #[] (empty bytecode
> string) makes no sense at all. Again, if bytecomp never produces such
> an objects and they're never used somewhere else, it should be treated
> as "impossible" object and error should be signaled once such an
> object is found. </IMHO>.
Indeed, we could also disallow them. If that's simpler, I'm fine with
this solution.
Stefan
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, (continued)
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Drew Adams, 2013/09/20
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2013/09/20
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Barry OReilly, 2013/09/20
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2013/09/20
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Barry OReilly, 2013/09/20
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Dmitry Antipov, 2013/09/20
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Dmitry Antipov, 2013/09/20
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2013/09/20
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Barry OReilly, 2013/09/25
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Dmitry Antipov, 2013/09/25
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Barry OReilly, 2013/09/25
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Dmitry Antipov, 2013/09/25
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2013/09/25
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Barry OReilly, 2013/09/25
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2013/09/25
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Barry OReilly, 2013/09/18
- bug#15405: 24.3; #[] freezes emacs, Stephen Berman, 2013/09/18