[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jun 2013 23:04:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Having XCONS and friends duplicated into a macro version and a function
>> version is a non-starter for me.
> Yes, I didn't like those macros either. I'll remove them; they're no
> longer needed now that GCC has the -Og option.
Sadly, I don't live in the same era as you do: my gcc doesn't take -Og yet.
> -O0 unpatched 2.89 3.1 12.4 57 1099
> -O0 patched 21.66 3.0 20.0 63 2442
An almost 10 times slowdown for the -O0 case is really problematic.
IOW I think it'll be a fine idea but only when -Og is supported in
Debian stable.
Stefan
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/06
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Andreas Schwab, 2013/06/06
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/06
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/08
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/15
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/15
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/17
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/09