[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12785: [octave-mod] Changed behaviour of octave-mark-block?
From: |
Mark Hepburn |
Subject: |
bug#12785: [octave-mod] Changed behaviour of octave-mark-block? |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:23:22 +1100 |
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
Regarding the "end|" case, the old mode wouldn't mark the block, and I feel that's correct behaviour. In the "|for" case as I mentioned, the old mode _did_ mark the block (not the enclosing one), but I agree that marking the enclosing block is probably preferable and more consistent.
In my case I was trying to get the same behaviour in some related code -- expand-region.el -- across both versions, but that has been resolved via other means anyway.
Cheers, Mark.