[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:52:25 -0800 |
> > >> Yes, indeed. I find it a bit scary, actually,
> > > It's not.
> >
> > I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing. What
> > scares me is the "what would happen without Eli?".
> That scares me as well.
I wasn't going to say anything, but I realized what Stefan meant and was
thinking the same thing (+1). And not just for the resulting loss of Windows
knowledge/support, obviously. Knock on wood.
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, (continued)
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Stefan Monnier, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Stefan Monnier, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Stefan Monnier, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/16
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Paul Eggert, 2012/11/17
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/17
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Paul Eggert, 2012/11/17
- bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/18
bug#12881: Assume at least POSIX.1-1988 for fcntl.h, Paul Eggert, 2012/11/15