[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12507: [debbugs-tracker] Processed: severity 12507 wishlist
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#12507: [debbugs-tracker] Processed: severity 12507 wishlist |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:50:00 -0700 |
> What I want to say is, why writing to buffer "*Bookmarks*", renaming
> this buffer to the filename buffer, and then saving it?
> Just use find-file-noselect, write data and save.
I see. You're talking only about the first arg of `with-current-buffer'. I
thought you were talking about `write-file' vs `save-buffer' and claiming that
there were two writes with the former.
Yes, of course. There is no need to use a different buffer, *Bookmarks*,
instead of the return value of `find-file-noselect'. I thought we had already
covered that.
There still might be a reason to use `write-file' instead of `save-buffer'. But
as I say, what's important is to decide about whether to allow backing up (and
visiting the file).
bug#12507: [debbugs-tracker] Processed: severity 12507 wishlist, Thierry Volpiatto, 2012/09/29
- bug#12507: [debbugs-tracker] Processed: severity 12507 wishlist,
Drew Adams <=
bug#12507: Option `(bookmark-)version-control': Use :tag so doc string matches menu, Karl Fogel, 2012/09/30