bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#11352: 24.1.50; revno 108047 broke assoc.el


From: Sam Steingold
Subject: bug#11352: 24.1.50; revno 108047 broke assoc.el
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:20:55 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)

In GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
 of 2012-04-26 on t520sds
Bzr revision: 108047 monnier@iro.umontreal.ca-20120426124328-gp2hlhjj57zsox58
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11004000
Configured using:
 `configure '--with-wide-int''


revno: 108047
committer: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Thu 2012-04-26 08:43:28 -0400
message:
  Replace lexical-let by lexical-binding (except Gnus, CEDET, ERT).
  * lisp/term/ns-win.el (ns-define-service):
  * lisp/progmodes/pascal.el (pascal-goto-defun):
  * lisp/progmodes/js.el (js--read-tab):
  * lisp/progmodes/etags.el (tags-lazy-completion-table):
  * lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el (syntax-propertize-via-font-lock):
  * lisp/emacs-lisp/ewoc.el (ewoc--wrap):
  * lisp/emacs-lisp/assoc.el (aput, adelete, amake):
  * lisp/doc-view.el (doc-view-convert-current-doc):
  * lisp/url/url.el (url-retrieve-synchronously):
  * lisp/vc/diff.el (diff-no-select): Replace lexical-let by lexical-binding.


this results in "unbound symbol copy" errors all over the place because
aget assumes dynamic binding for copy:

  (let ((copy (copy-alist alist)))
    (cond ((null alist) nil)
------>>> ((progn (asort 'copy key)  <<<--------------
                  (anot-head-p copy key)) nil)
          ((cdr (car copy)))
          (keynil-p nil)
          ((car (car copy)))
          (t nil)))



-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) X 11.0.11004000
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://openvotingconsortium.org http://camera.org
http://thereligionofpeace.com http://palestinefacts.org
Lisp is a language for doing what you've been told is impossible. - Kent Pitman





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]