[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11298: Recipe to surface *code-conversion-work* buffer
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#11298: Recipe to surface *code-conversion-work* buffer |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:39:25 +0200 |
>> This is my little excursion in to killing *scratch* (to death?)
>
> Now I am wondering whether:
> 1. *scratch* buffer re-generates itself
It does because Emacs needs at least one buffer it can display.
> 2. Why some buffers like *code-conversion-work* (and other internal
> buffers like "Minibuf", "Echo Area") gets /surfaced/ in some buffer
> listings, but totally disappears in the next buffer listing.
Usually they are not displayed because their names start with a space.
> For want of better place to put this, I am attaching it to *scratch*
> buffer bug report.
>
> Read on.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> ------------------
>
> 1. Emacs -Q
> 2. C-x b TAB gives me
> ,----
> | Click <mouse-2> on a completion to select it.
> | In this buffer, type RET to select the completion near point.
> |
> | Possible completions are:
> | *Messages*
> `----
> 3. C-g. Now you are in *scratch*
> 4. Kill *scratch* => *Messages* shows up
> 5. Kill *Messages* => *Completions* shows up
> 6. Kill *Completions* => *scratch* shows up
>
> Now I get confused. Why does *scratch* show up again. Didn't I kill
> it before?
Because when you killed the last other buffer whose name didn't start
with a space, *scratch* got regenerated.
> 7. C-x b TAB TAB gets me this
> ,----
> | Click <mouse-2> on a completion to select it.
> | In this buffer, type RET to select the completion near point.
> |
> | Possible completions are:
> | *Echo Area 0* *Echo Area 1*
> | *Minibuf-0* *Minibuf-1*
> | *code-conversion-work*
> `----
>
> I choose to examine *code-conversion-work*. The name seems
> interesting. This is what I see there when I visit it:
>
> ,----
> | c:/Program Files/emacs-24.0.95/lisp/emacs-lisp/easymenu.elc
> `----
>
Usually, buffers whose names start with a space are not proposed. But
since you killed all other buffers what do you want Emacs to propose?
> 8. C-x b TAB now shows
> ,----
> | Click <mouse-2> on a completion to select it.
> | In this buffer, type RET to select the completion near point.
> |
> | Possible completions are:
> | *Completions*
> | *Messages*
> | *scratch*
> `----
>
> Note that special buffers that show up in step 7 has disappeared.
Because these buffer have been recreated in the meantime.
Is there anything bad about the behavior you observed?
martin
- bug#11298: 24.0.95; (WISH) Re-look scratch buffers, (continued)
- bug#11298: 24.0.95; (WISH) Re-look scratch buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/21
- bug#11298: 24.0.95; (WISH) Re-look scratch buffers, Jambunathan K, 2012/04/21
- bug#11298: 24.0.95; (WISH) Re-look scratch buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/23
- bug#11298: 24.0.95; (WISH) Re-look scratch buffers, Lennart Borgman, 2012/04/23
- bug#11298: 24.0.95; (WISH) Re-look scratch buffers, Drew Adams, 2012/04/23
- bug#11298: 24.0.95; (WISH) Re-look scratch buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/23
- bug#11298: 24.0.95; (WISH) Re-look scratch buffers, Drew Adams, 2012/04/24
bug#11298: Recipe to surface *code-conversion-work* buffer, Jambunathan K, 2012/04/24
- bug#11298: Recipe to surface *code-conversion-work* buffer,
martin rudalics <=
bug#11298: Scratch buffer (Summary of Xah's proposals, as I see it), Jambunathan K, 2012/04/24
bug#11298: Scratch buffer (Summary of Xah's proposals, as I see it), Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/24