[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9663: 23.2; feature wish: put priority on vcursor overlay
From: |
Hendrik Tews |
Subject: |
bug#9663: 23.2; feature wish: put priority on vcursor overlay |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:54:40 +0200 |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes:
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:35:18 +0200
Subject: Re: bug#9663: 23.2; feature wish: put priority on vcursor overlay
Hendrik Tews <tews@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> writes:
> same priority. Which makes me wonder: why other overlay have
> you bumped into which has either higher priority than nil, or
> nil priority but is not larger than vcursor.
>
> As I wrote in the feature wish: the locked region in Proof
> General (proof-locked-span). It has priority 100, see the call to
> span-raise inside proof-init-segmentation in
> generic/proof-script.el.
So perhaps this is a bug in Proof General and doesn't really require an
overlay priority in Emacs?
Could you explain why using a non-deprecated feature (priorities
of overlays) is a bug?
I really don't understand this discussion about a very simple
feature wish with a very simple patch. Overlay priorities do
exist, so vcursor better should work in the presence of overlays
with non-zero priorities, shouldn't it?
Bye,
Hendrik