[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10906: 24.0.94; `c-mark-function' does set the mark well
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#10906: 24.0.94; `c-mark-function' does set the mark well |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hello, Dani.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:02:44AM +0100, Dani Moncayo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:14, Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org> wrote:
> >[...]
> > Regarding bug#10906, I think `c-mark-function' should be rewritten
> > to follow the logic of `mark-defun'.
Any chance of a quick summary of how c-mark-function differs from
mark-defun?
> Agreed, and BTW, if `c-mark-function' is going to be revised, please,
> take also this problem into account:
> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5525
Again, what is this bug? Could you not even quote the title line from
it?
> Thanks.
> --
> Dani Moncayo
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- bug#10906: 24.0.94; `c-mark-function' does set the mark well,
Alan Mackenzie <=
bug#10906: 24.0.94; `c-mark-function' does set the mark well, Glenn Morris, 2012/03/01