[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9911: valgrind warning in process.c:send_process
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
bug#9911: valgrind warning in process.c:send_process |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:39:06 +0900 |
In article <yxqzkgif9ck.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>, Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
writes:
> valgrind ./temacs
> produces this warning
> ==30382== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==30382== at 0x6302A9: send_process (process.c:5398)
> ==30382== by 0x630DC8: Fprocess_send_string (process.c:5648)
> ==30382== by 0x5D6D61: Ffuncall (eval.c:2977)
> ==30382== by 0x622C5B: exec_byte_code (bytecode.c:785)
> ==30382== by 0x5D77BA: funcall_lambda (eval.c:3205)
> ==30382== by 0x5D6F4C: Ffuncall (eval.c:3023)
> ==30382== by 0x622C5B: exec_byte_code (bytecode.c:785)
> ==30382== by 0x5D77BA: funcall_lambda (eval.c:3205)
> ==30382== by 0x5D6F4C: Ffuncall (eval.c:3023)
> ==30382== by 0x622C5B: exec_byte_code (bytecode.c:785)
> ==30382== by 0x5D77BA: funcall_lambda (eval.c:3205)
> ==30382== by 0x5D6F4C: Ffuncall (eval.c:3023)
> Looks like struct coding_system.src_multibyte needs to be
> initialized.
I fixed it. But as "valgrind ./temacs" segfaults in my
environment, I can't confirm the fix. Please check if the
fix is correct or not.
---
Kenichi Handa
handa@m17n.org
- bug#9911: valgrind warning in process.c:send_process,
Kenichi Handa <=