[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#2179: 23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax
|
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
bug#2179: 23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:59:10 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>>> Since define-key-after is only useful for menu-bar bindings which don't
>>> use characters in keys this doesn't look like a serious restriction.
>>
>> The doc string of `define-key-after' doesn't say that it's only for
>> menu-bar bindings.
>
> define-key-after is a compiled Lisp function in `subr.el'.
> [...]
> The order of bindings in a keymap matters when it is used as a menu.
So?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/