[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:18:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
>> -o and -g does not imply -l.
>
> They do.
-g like -l, but do not list owner
>> So "(must include -l or similar)" might be best...
>
> Nobody needs that.
jidanni did, and I did. QED.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/10
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11