[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el
From: |
sho nakatani |
Subject: |
bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:57:11 +0900 |
Hi.
2011/3/31 Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org>:
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
>>> Implementation-wise, the difference is that Nakatani's current
>>> approach simply uses the image slice for the geometry, your rectangle
>>> approach requires another buffer-local variable.
>>
>> I don't see why you'd need another buffer-local var. It'd just set
>> the zoom level and the scrolling. Unless you mean a new buffer-local
>> var to remember "keep it fitted", but I don't need that.
>
> Oh, right. So you'd set the rectangle once, which would adjust the zoom
> level and hscroll, and since doc-view preserves the hscroll anyway,
> there's nothing to remember.
>
> Hm, I can see that this is also handy, although not much different to
> slice&fit. One complication here is that you have to set the hscroll in
> terms of columns while the rectangle is pixel-based.
>
> Nakatani, if you want, you could try to implement a
> `doc-view-fit-rectangle-to-window' function. Basically, the right
Off course I'm interested in it but unfortunatelly I don't have enough
time. My school will begin soon and I want to give my all energy
to my research and study.
Although it is possible that I start to implement the function after
a month or so, I cannot be certain about it.
So if anyone (including Tassilo :-D ) can try it, it would be better
than just waiting for my implementation.
I feel a bit sorry not to be able to help you ;-(
Bye,
--
Sho Nakatani
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, (continued)
- Message not available
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, Tassilo Horn, 2011/03/30
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, sho nakatani, 2011/03/30
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, Tassilo Horn, 2011/03/30
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, sho nakatani, 2011/03/30
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, Tassilo Horn, 2011/03/30
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, sho nakatani, 2011/03/30
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/30
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, Tassilo Horn, 2011/03/30
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/30
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, Tassilo Horn, 2011/03/31
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el,
sho nakatani <=
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, Tassilo Horn, 2011/03/31
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el, joakim, 2011/03/29