bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#7962: 23.2; capitalize letters ISO-8859-1 with diacritic signs in em


From: Emmanuel Bigler
Subject: bug#7962: 23.2; capitalize letters ISO-8859-1 with diacritic signs in emacs 23.2.1
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:00:29 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7

Le 03/02/2011 22:19, Eli Zaretskii a écrit :
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:49:22 +0100
From: Emmanuel Bigler<address@hidden>
Cc:

However I am reluctant to switch to UTF-8 for all my texts in English,
German, French, even Icelandic etc... i.e. Western European languages,
the only ones I'll ever typeset, which are perfectly handled in
unibyte iso-8859-1.

You seem to assume that going multibyte requires that your files be
encoded in UTF-8.  That simply isn't true.  The files can continue be
encoded in ISO-8859-1 or ISO-8859-15; Emacs will decode them into its
internal representation when you visit the file and encode it back
when you save it.  You lose nothing.



OK Eli. I'm trying to understand and this is a bit tricky.
Now I'm entering into **very** strange things ; I hope somebody can explain what's going on. This is emacs 23.2.93.1

1/ in an emacs buffer I load a test-file created years ago with a program, a list of unibyte characters that I display as iso-8859-1. All characters are displayed properly.

2/ I (toggle-enable-multibyte-characters nil) : unibyte characters already present in the files do not change and are displayed correctly. I type a fresh sequence of letters with diacritic signs at the end of the buffer : OK. I toggle back to unibyte : freshly entered letters appear as 2-byte sequences. OK

3/ now I cut-paste a line of the old unibyte file and enter a fresh letter with diacritic sign in thye middel of this line ; I'm still in 2-byte codeing/display : the letter entered in the middle of unibytes seems to stay unibyte !! Is this a bug, a feature, or misconceptions / misunderstandings on my side ??

------------

From Sven :
> IMO offering to convert them to UTF-8 would be more helpful.  The
> legacy encodings ought to die some day.

Exactly like legacy software should die some day ; (ahem) : who said : "exacty like emacs, an old and obsolete software, that I've been using for 25 years..." ;-);-)

--

Emmanuel







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]