[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:15:59 -0700 |
> No: m-l-h is also unnecessary when add-hook is called with a nil LOCAL
> argument. I know of no case where calling make-local-hook makes
> a difference in Emacs>=21.
In Emacs 20 also there is a LOCAL optional arg to add-hook. Should all code for
Emacs 20-24 remove make-local-hook calls and instead add `t' to an existing call
to add-hook? That is, if there already is a call to add-hook, in addition to a
call to make-local-hook, should the latter be removed and a non-nil LOCAL arg be
added to the former?
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, Gian Uberto Lauri, 2010/10/18
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, Stefan Monnier, 2010/10/18
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, saint, 2010/10/18
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, Stefan Monnier, 2010/10/18
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/10/18
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, Stefan Monnier, 2010/10/18
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, Stefan Monnier, 2010/10/19
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, Drew Adams, 2010/10/19
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, saint, 2010/10/19
- bug#7236: 24.0.50; make-local-hook missing, Stefan Monnier, 2010/10/19