[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:00:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> What I saw was the even 2 lines high buffer made fit-window-to-buffer
> delete sibling windows. All the time - but... I thought I knew how to
> reproduce it. So I did not write any test procedures, I was just a bit
> irritated. A mistake.
[...]
> This function killed all other siblings even if it just actually needs
> two lines if certain conditions are met. (Those I tried to describe.)
>
> So this was just a desperate attempt to stop that. I do not know what
> to do at the moment. I will try to reproduce this and look a bit
> closer at it later.
Deleting other windows when resizing was a misguided feature. I don't
do that any more for quite some time and didn't miss it yet ;-)
In any case, the issue whether a position is visible in a window is a
priori not related to the issue whether resizing is allowed to delete
any windows. You patch might handle a few cases, accidentally ...
martin
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/09
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/11
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/11
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13