bug#6299: In read-file-name: (args-out-of-range "c:" 0 3)

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I've installed the patch below which should hopefully fix the
>> original problem.  Please confirm.
> Thanks, it works.

Good thing done,

> I meant the argument ACTION to some function, but what exactly was
> I reading??
[...]
> There is no ACTION arg to try-completion etc.

The ACTION is not passed to try-completion but from try-completion to
the completion table (when it's a function).  I've just installed the
patch below to try and improve the documentation of those issues.


        Stefan


=== modified file 'doc/lispref/minibuf.texi'
--- doc/lispref/minibuf.texi    2010-05-03 22:01:23 +0000
+++ doc/lispref/minibuf.texi    2010-05-30 21:10:01 +0000
@@ -812,6 +812,24 @@
 If @var{collection} is a function, it is called with three arguments,
 the values @var{string}, @var{predicate} and @code{lambda}; whatever
 it returns, @code{test-completion} returns in turn.
+
+@defun completion-boundaries string collection predicate suffix
+This function returns the boundaries of the field on which @var{collection}
+will operate, assuming that @var{string} holds the text before point
+and @var{suffix} holds the text after point.
+
+Normally completion operates on the whole string, so for all normal
+collections, this will always return @code{(0 . (length
+@var{suffix}))}.  But more complex completion such as completion on
+files is done one field at a time.  For example, completion of
+@code{"/usr/sh"} will include @code{"/usr/share/"} but not
+@code{"/usr/share/doc"} even if @code{"/usr/share/doc"} exists.
+Also @code{all-completions} on @code{"/usr/sh"} will not include
+@code{"/usr/share/"} but only @code{"share/"}.  So if @var{string} is
+@code{"/usr/sh"} and @var{suffix} is @code{"e/doc"},
+@code{completion-boundaries} will return @code{(5 . 1)} which tells us
+that the @var{collection} will only return completion information that
+pertains to the area after @code{"/usr/"} and before @code{"/doc"}.
 @end defun
 
 If you store a completion alist in a variable, you should mark the
@@ -1618,13 +1636,14 @@
 can supply your own function to compute the completion of a given
 string.  This is called @dfn{programmed completion}.  Emacs uses
 programmed completion when completing file names (@pxref{File Name
-Completion}).
+Completion}), among many other cases.
 
-  To use this feature, pass a symbol with a function definition as the
-@var{collection} argument to @code{completing-read}.  The function
+  To use this feature, pass a function as the @var{collection}
+argument to @code{completing-read}.  The function
 @code{completing-read} arranges to pass your completion function along
-to @code{try-completion} and @code{all-completions}, which will then let
-your function do all the work.
+to @code{try-completion}, @code{all-completions}, and other basic
+completion functions, which will then let your function do all
+the work.
 
   The completion function should accept three arguments:
 
@@ -1638,10 +1657,14 @@
 and ignore the possible match if the predicate returns @code{nil}.
 
 @item
-A flag specifying the type of operation.
+A flag specifying the type of operation.  The best way to think about
+it is that the function stands for an object (in the
+``object-oriented'' sense of the word), and this third argument
+specifies which method to run.
 @end itemize
 
-  There are three flag values for three operations:
+  There are currently four methods, i.e. four flag values, one for
+  each of the four different basic operations:
 
 @itemize @bullet
 @item
@@ -1663,6 +1686,13 @@
 @code{lambda} specifies @code{test-completion}.  The completion
 function should return @code{t} if the specified string is an exact
 match for some possibility; @code{nil} otherwise.
+
+@item
+@code{(boundaries . SUFFIX)} specifies @code{completion-boundaries}.
+The function should return a value of the form @code{(boundaries
+START . END)} where START is the position of the beginning boundary in
+in the string to complete, and END is the position of the end boundary
+in SUFFIX.
 @end itemize
 
   It would be consistent and clean for completion functions to allow