[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ?

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ?
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:31:19 -0400

    Eg (with-fewer-warnings '(obsolete cl-functions) ...)

    would not warn about obsolete things or cl-functions in the body. The
    possible arguments are the members of byte-compile-warnings.

    I can implement this if it is considered worth it (it's very similar
    to with-no-warnings).

I think it isn't worth doing, because it would only gain you very much
if you put a lot of code inside with-no-warnings; we avoid doing that.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]