bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#4807: marked as done (23.1.50; Unhelpful user visible type error in


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#4807: marked as done (23.1.50; Unhelpful user visible type error in transpose-lines)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:10:06 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:59:39 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#4807: 23.1.50; Unhelpful user visible type error in  
transpose-lines
has caused the Emacs bug report #4807,
regarding 23.1.50; Unhelpful user visible type error in transpose-lines
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact address@hidden
immediately.)


-- 
4807: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4807
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 23.1.50; Unhelpful user visible type error in transpose-lines Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:30:53 +0800
With an argument of 0, transpose-lines will swap the lines that point
and mark are in. In a fresh buffer in which mark has not yet been set
this will result in a type error:

   (wrong-type-argument integer-or-marker-p nil)

This isn't very helpful to the user. exchange-point-and-mark fails in
the same conditions with the much clearer phrasing "No mark set in
this buffer", perhaps transpose-lines should copy that.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#4807: 23.1.50; Unhelpful user visible type error in transpose-lines Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:59:39 +0100
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:30, Geoff Gole <address@hidden> wrote:

> This isn't very helpful to the user. exchange-point-and-mark fails in
> the same conditions with the much clearer phrasing "No mark set in
> this buffer", perhaps transpose-lines should copy that.

Fixed, thanks.

    Juanma

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]