bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place

[Stephen Berman]

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:45:07 +0300 Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org> wrote:

>>> Hi; I haven't been following this, but after a quick skim of the
>>> (long) thread, I think neither the current nor the proposed behaviour
>>> is ideal (it seems to be a choice between getting the height wrong or
>>> the width wrong), but I prefer the current one. I'd rather leave it as
>>> is for now, and look to improve it after 23.1.
>>
>> I believe the behaviour of the calendar is now fixed in this regard.
>> I don't know if there is anything else left to do for this lengthy
>> bug, or if it can be closed now.
>
> Thank you.  I wonder how did you test your change.  In emacs -Q
> I see a strange window configuration after `M-x calendar RET'
> in a single wide window:
>
>     +-------------------------+        +------------+------------+
>     |                         |        |            |            |
>     |                         |        |            |            |
>     |                         |        |            |            |
>     |                         |        |            |            |
>     |                         |        |            |            |
>     |                         |        |            |            |
>     |                         |  ===>  |            |            |
>     |                         |        |            |            |
>     |                         |        |            | *Messages* |
>     |                         |        |            +------------+
>     |                         |        |            |            |
>     | *scratch*               |        | *scratch*  | *Calendar* |
>     +-------------------------+        +------------+------------+
>
> I believe it was supposed to do rather:
>
>     +-------------------------+        +-------------------------+
>     |                         |        |                         |
>     |                         |        |                         |
>     |                         |        |                         |
>     |                         |        |                         |
>     |                         |        |                         |
>     |                         |        |                         |
>     |                         |  ===>  |                         |
>     |                         |        |                         |
>     |                         |        | *scratch*               |
>     |                         |        +-------------------------+
>     |                         |        |                         |
>     | *scratch*               |        | *Calendar*              |
>     +-------------------------+        +-------------------------+
>
> i.e. the calendar to always appear directly below from the current window.

I also see this.  What's more, I have things configured so that calling
Calendar also pops up the fancy diary display, and starting with a
single (screen-) wide window, the result is similar to the above, namely:

     +-------------------------+        +------------+------------+
     |                         |        |            |            |
     |                         |        |            |            |
     |                         |        |            |            |
     |                         |        |            |            |
     |                         |        |            |            |
     |                         |        |            |            |
     |                         |  ===>  |            |            |
     |                         |        |            |            |
     |                         |        |            | *Messages* |
     |                         |        |            +------------+
     |                         |        |            |            |
     | *scratch*               |        |    Diary   | *Calendar* |
     +-------------------------+        +------------+------------+

(Note that in the result *scratch* is not displayed in the frame, but
instead the previous buffer *Messages*.)

Steve Berman