[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:33:54 -0700 |
> > I proposed making the variable always buffer-local. If you
> > don't want to do that, then yes, each mode for which nil
> > is appropriate would need to do that.
>
> I think this is a global feature. Making it buffer local by default is
> probably not the best then.
Why? No reason given.
But you say "then", as if being a global variable is a reason it shouldn't have
a buffer-local value.
> It would be on the same level as makeing
> the binding of C-n/C-p buffer local by default.
Since we have apparently replaced the classic behavior of `next-line', so it
respects `line-move-visual', yes. (But I personally have no problem if we go
back to the classic behavior, with normal line movement in all buffers.)
If a non-nil value of `line-move-visual' is not appropriate for some (most?)
buffers, but (some people think) it is appropriate for some other buffers, then
that's the obvious conclusion: make it buffer-local.
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Chong Yidong, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Stefan Monnier, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/06/02
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Lennart Borgman, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/12
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Stefan Monnier, 2009/06/12