bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#2251: 23.0.90; Summary by label in RMAIL


From: root
Subject: bug#2251: 23.0.90; Summary by label in RMAIL
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:43:15 +0000 (GMT)



On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Glenn Morris wrote:

jpff wrote:

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (args-out-of-range [(65 "answered") (68 "deleted") (69 "edited") (70 "filed") (82 
"retried") (83 "forwarded") (85 "unseen") (114 "resent")] 8)
  rmail-get-attr-names(16410)

What does the X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: header in message 16410 look like?
I'm guessing it is corrupted.


It says

From mantaraya36@gmail.com Mon Mar 10 11:22:33 2008
X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: --E-----
        x       X-Coding-System: iso-8859-1-unix
Return-path: <mantaraya36@gmail.com>
Envelope-to: jpff@codemist.co.uk
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:22:33 +0000
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176])
        by west.codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
        (envelope-from <mantaraya36@gmail.com>)
        id 1JYg5D-0001Ay-4J
        for jpff@codemist.co.uk; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:22:33 +0000
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m38so2212090waf.16
        for <jpff@codemist.co.uk>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;

h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=eAdfe+KUAGyB46exC4Hz4RkYUojyGkrFaRadGwVoLAk=;

b=hK+0xccE/eZocss2U9zx238ITW+AW8hG/OI9FhYDd3GoFVJoaWC9HZHZkdGkmM3zIuSkxlI+3XkOxOcdExCqsMnP56boCOgYDRTa+FpaweIeLnXP8LH4M/s4YT423Unjgf40qHFXMBcmDxoFh097dpdB7mmaPliZpebw8uo1Eb0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;

h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;

b=ACo5YZRbsAH7ghjoYWNrM4ZnnLnIeEPqlEnacE1rC7jo4hZyt0itCjEumwkhlbZBagi/Zygfx+a3MULhmfaw8IHi2WCxhgen5z3xg5WWK2fvCDiw7wfrI63bprb9nvSxh2bm7jf7AStvauC4UnouDrlJz+US4Kvz8z9MPX0LdN8=
Received: by 10.114.57.1 with SMTP id f1mr3234936waa.78.1205148127289;
        Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.177.14 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6d8a7ed20803100422k2a9e481dy8ecc4733aeda7477@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:22:07 -0500
From: "Andres Cabrera" <mantaraya36@gmail.com>
To: jpff <jpff@codemist.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Loadable Opcodes in OLPC
In-Reply-To: <7277-Mon10Mar2008082727+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <5D053EEC-6832-4E3D-A9AE-B52810EAAA55@comcast.net>
         <82A52A46-7D46-47E7-B28C-DFAE0F7A895B@comcast.net>
         <6d8a7ed20803092049r6bb8f646q433cf774042cbdd2@mail.gmail.com>
         <7277-Mon10Mar2008082727+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)

If it is corrupted it is emacs that did it.

==John ff









reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]