[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1399: 23.0.60; Some Unicode glyphs incorrectly mapped to CJK
|
From: |
Chong Yidong |
|
Subject: |
bug#1399: 23.0.60; Some Unicode glyphs incorrectly mapped to CJK |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:26:05 -0500 |
Hi Handa-san,
Could you take a look at this bug report?
Ian Eure <ian@digg.com> wrote:
> It seems that some Unicode glyphs are incorrectly categorized.
>
> For example, U+201C, U+201D, U+2018, U+2019 (LEFT/RIGHT SINGLE/DOUBLE
> QUOTATION MARK) are all mapped into the CHK category. This results in
> the use of the STHeiti font for those characters, which are a
> different width than the normal font I've chosen.
>
> I think it's incorrect for them to be categorized as CJK, since they
> are widely used in latin scripts.