[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what-cursor-position vs. Unicode
|
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
|
Subject: |
Re: what-cursor-position vs. Unicode |
|
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:01:31 +0900 |
|
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <87irnjklv0.fsf@jidanni.org>, Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
writes:
> Today we shall discuss what-cursor-position when given an argument of ^U.
> We see that it gives Unicode information:
> character: Z (90, #o132, #x5a, U+005A)
> Except when you really need it:
> character: 丹 (107109, #o321145, #x1a265)
> It should mention U+4E39.
> emacs-version "22.0.50.1"
#x1a265 is a character of chinese-cns11643-1, and the
current Emacs doesn't support Unicode mapping for that
character set.
---
Kenichi Handa
handa@m17n.org