|
From: | Kevin Rodgers |
Subject: | Re: Bug in clone-indirect-buffer and clone-indirect-buffer-other-window |
Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:41:40 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041105) |
Jay Bingham wrote: > Personally, I would prefer to have some way to differentiate between > buffers which contain different files with the same name and buffers > that actually point to the same file without having to enter a name > for the clone. I also prefer the numeric indicator to follow the > existing buffer name. Realizing the the same function is likely used > to generate the file names I am still willing to suggest that perhaps > the `[N]' or `{N}' designators could be used to indicate a cloned > buffer as opposed to an automatically generated file name. Perhaps you can use (require 'uniquify) to help get what you want -- see the uniquify-buffer-name-style and uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p options. -- Kevin Rodgers
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |