[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:54:31 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:43:24 +0000
> From: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
> >
> >I agree. IIRC, 21.3 had a couple of annoying last-minute bugs.
> >
> Its a good idea if we can stick to a quick pretest cycle (a couple of
> weeks at the most).
Agreed.
I think this should be possible because, as you said, the release
branch didn't see commits for a long time.
The hardest thing would be to find a victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteer to
do package the tarballs and deltas and generally supervise the
release process.
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, (continued)
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Harald Maier, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Harald Maier, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Harald Maier, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Harald Maier, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Harald Maier, 2004/02/14