[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:37:59 -0500 |
It makes no sense to think about unload-feature in terms
of the cl package. That is a very hard case. Other cases
will work before that one does.
However, the motive for unload-feature had to do with
reclaiming memory. With the other changes in size of machines,
size of disks, and size of Emacs address space, maybe that is
pointless. Maybe we should eliminate unload-feature just
to make things simpler and avoid spending time on it.
- the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/05
- the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/01/05
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/06
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/07
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/09
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/01/09
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/01/12
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/15
- Message not available
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/16
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/16
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/16
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/16
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/12
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/11
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/15
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/16