[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: confusion over undocumented syntax-table features, font-lock and syn
From: |
Matt Swift |
Subject: |
Re: confusion over undocumented syntax-table features, font-lock and syntax-tables |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Feb 2003 15:11:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 |
>> "L" == Luc wrote:
L> I just was thinking about too many things at the same time and
L> forgot about the exact meaning of char-syntax for a moment.
[...]
L> I do not believe that there are any bugs related to the things
L> discussed in this thread. Matthew just forgot about text
L> properties and I just totally got confused for a while.
Yes, I did not even realize that a text property could override the
syntax table.
One question remains, which may yet be bug of some kind:
What is the meaning of assigning a matching char to chars in syntax
class comment-starter (`<') or string-quote (`"')? Several packages,
including sh-script.el, make such an assignment, but I do not see that
the meaning of matching chars is documented except for syntax classes
open-parenthesis and close-parenthesis.
- confusion over undocumented syntax-table features, font-lock and syntax-tables, Matthew Swift, 2003/02/11
- confusion over undocumented syntax-table features, font-lock and syntax-tables, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/12
- Re: confusion over undocumented syntax-table features, font-lock and syntax-tables, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/12
- Re: confusion over undocumented syntax-table features, font-lock and syntax-tables, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/13
- Re: confusion over undocumented syntax-table features, font-lock and syntax-tables,
Matt Swift <=
- confusion over undocumented syntax-table features, font-lock and syntax-tables, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/15