[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad rfc2047 encoding
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: bad rfc2047 encoding |
Date: |
30 Aug 2002 18:59:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Bjørn Mork <bmork@dod.no> writes:
> I am no expert on this, but trying to read RFC2822 and RFC2047 makes
> me think that Simon is right. A 'quoted-string' is a 'word', and may
> as such be replaced by an 'encoded-word'.
Sure.
> The DQUOTE is part of the
> 'quoted-string' and should therefore be encoded with it.
Why should they be there at all?
> So the proper way to encode
>
> From: "Bjørn Mork" <bmork@dod.no>
>
> would be
>
> From: =?iso-8859-1?q?=22Bj=F8rn_Mork=22?= <bmork@dod.no>
I'm not sure that's the right way to look at it, which is probably why
it isn't treated explicitly in the RFC. As far as I remember, the RFC
implies that your name should be encoded as
`=?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F8rn_Mork?='. Why should quotes be introduced at
all? RFC2822 only deals with ASCII, and defines what ASCII characters
need quoting -- it's silent on non-ASCII isn't it?
> I guess. An example of proper handling of a 'quoted-string' in RFC2047
> would have been nice. But as far as I can see, this is the only way
> you can do compliant encoding without losing any information.
As I understand it, the quotes aren't information content, just
syntax. I'd think they should be stripped when the word is non-ASCII
and the contents should then be rfc2047-encoded. Do any
specifications forbid that?
[Are there any more recent RFCs that are relevant, by any chance?]
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, (continued)
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Simon Josefsson, 2002/08/20
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Dave Love, 2002/08/21
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Simon Josefsson, 2002/08/21
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Reiner Steib, 2002/08/21
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Dave Love, 2002/08/22
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Simon Josefsson, 2002/08/22
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Dave Love, 2002/08/30
- Message not available
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Simon Josefsson, 2002/08/21
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Dave Love, 2002/08/22
- Message not available
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Bjørn Mork, 2002/08/22
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding,
Dave Love <=
- Message not available
- Re: bad rfc2047 encoding, Simon Josefsson, 2002/08/22