Re: wid-edit.el

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:53:59 +0100
> 
> >     (2.0) The current code of wid-edit.el is correct. "image.el" is
> >           meaningful even with "-nw".
> 
> Does it do any harm?  'image.el' appears to be a rather small file.
> 
> >     (2.1) wid-edit.el should avoid loading "image.el" and should be
> >           modified to implement this.
> >
> >     (2.3) wid-edit.el should avoid loading "image.el", however, to
> >           make code simple, the current coding style was chosen.
> 
> Maybe, the problem seem to be the 'checkbox' widget call
> 'create-image' for :on-glyph and :off-glyph.  These calls could be
> "lazy evaled" to delay the actual creation, but it would complicate
> the code.  I have no opinion on whether that would be worthwhile.

While I agree that it would be nice if image.el wouldn't be loaded
under -nw, it should not make any trouble if it does.

What exactly is the problem?  Does Emacs signal an error when
image.el loads?