[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
excessive [?\C-x ? and [?\C-x ?]] paging needed in emacs dired-x buffe
excessive [?\C-x ? and [?\C-x ?]] paging needed in emacs dired-x buffers
27 Oct 2001 16:13:09 -0500
This bug report will be sent to the Free Software Foundation,
not to your local site managers!
Please write in English, because the Emacs maintainers do not have
translators to read other languages for them.
Your bug report will be posted to the address@hidden mailing list,
and to the gnu.emacs.bug news group.
In GNU Emacs 21.1.1 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7, X toolkit)
of 2001-10-23 on rm50
configured using `configure --prefix=/lsi/soft/misc'
value of $LC_ALL: nil
value of $LC_COLLATE: nil
value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
value of $LC_MONETARY: nil
value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil
value of $LC_TIME: nil
value of $LANG: nil
Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug
and the precise symptoms of the bug:
In previous emacs versions, only one single set of C-x [ and C-x ]
dired-x keystrokes were required to page forward to the next /...: line.
The new emacs version requires twice the keystrokes.
PAGING IS CONCEPTUALLY A STEPPING BETWEEN SIMILAR THINGS, WHEREAS THE
NEW BEHAVIOR STEPS BETWEEN DIS-SIMILAR THINGS, VIOLATING THE BASIC
MEANING OF A "PAGE".
I can see why some people might want the new behavior, but it should be
an optional choice. The former behavior is more consistent with the
concept of paging.
Since C-x [ requires 4 distinct hand/finger motions (control x upfingers
[) or 2 complex motions, arriving at the first entry of a subdirectory
requires 8 motions in the new scheme and only 7 in the old scheme
(control x upfingers [ n n n). ... Furthermore, the new scheme
drastically reduces the degree of FORWARD PROGRESS available in dired-x
mode, leaving 1 to 3 M-$ hideall commands followed with n the only way
to regain the speed in skipping between subdirectories.
a s k e d SPC w h e r e SPC t h e SPC c g i SPC s c
r i p t s SPC c o u l d SPC b e SPC s t o r e d ? <backspace>
. SPC <backspace> C-c C-c C-x s ! t C-x 1 C-x d C-g
C-x b m i <tab> <return> $ n n n n $ C-x ] C-x ] C-x
[ C-x [ M-x b u g <tab> <backspace> <backspace> <backspace>
e m <tab> C-g M-x r e p o <tab> r <tab> <return>
To exit, simply kill this buffer and return to list.
Type C-x 1 to remove *todo tmp* window. M-C-v to scroll the help.
Making completion list...
Making completion list...
Daniel Ortmann, 2450 Marion Road SE, Suite 106, Rochester, MN 55904
address@hidden / 507.529.3887 (w)
address@hidden / 507.288.7732 (h)
RE: excessive [?\C-x ? and [?\C-x ?]] paging needed in emacs dired-x buffers, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/10/29
- excessive [?\C-x ? and [?\C-x ?]] paging needed in emacs dired-x buffers,
Daniel Ortmann <=