[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: B&W display and emacs21
From: |
Adam |
Subject: |
Re: B&W display and emacs21 |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 18:19:39 -0400 |
> adam@cfar.umd.edu (Adam) writes:
>
> > [adam@pepsi adam]$ /usr/local/emacs21/bin/emacs -fn '10x20'
> > No fonts match `-*-fixed-medium-r-normal-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1'
> > [adam@pepsi adam]$ xterm -fn '10x20'
> > [xterm starts fine]
>
> xterm reverts to the `fixed' font if the specified font doesn't work.
> Maybe that explains the different behavior?
I think it selects '10x20' font after all, so it seems to look to my
untrained eye. for sure it is noticeably different than default font.
--
Adam
http://www.eax.com The Supreme Headquarters of the 32 bit registers
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, (continued)
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Adam, 2001/10/24
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/24
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Adam, 2001/10/24
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/24
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/24
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Adam, 2001/10/24
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/25
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Stefan Monnier, 2001/10/24
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Adam, 2001/10/23
- Re: B&W display and emacs21, Kai Großjohann, 2001/10/22
- Re: B&W display and emacs21,
Adam <=
Re: B&W display and emacs21, Kenichi Handa, 2001/10/24