[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setenv
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: setenv |
Date: |
26 Sep 2001 10:16:07 +0900 |
David desJardins <david@desjardins.org> writes:
> But I can't really imagine having anything that I want to stick around
> for longer than that (the OP said "a week"!). Do you run programs
> inside gdb for a week at a time?
Well, OK, I don't generally do that!
Sometimes I do have hairy debugging sessions where I end up with 10 or
20 wierd conditional breakpoints, and other bits of gdb-internal state,
that are quite annoying to reproduce if my gdb session goes away when
emacs crashes. Of course I could try to save all this in a file, in
case of a crash, but it's typically all very fragmented and dependent on
the particular state of the running programm, and I generally am too
focused on the problem at hand to think much about emacs crashing.
[though indeed I have had emacs crash in such a circustance...]
-Miles
--
`Cars give people wonderful freedom and increase their opportunities.
But they also destroy the environment, to an extent so drastic that
they kill all social life' (from _A Pattern Language_)
- Re: setenv, (continued)
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/23
- Re: setenv, Hallvard B Furuseth, 2001/09/24
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, David desJardins, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, David desJardins, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: setenv, Stefan Monnier, 2001/09/26
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/26