[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Futile bug reports?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Futile bug reports? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:48:05 -0600 (MDT) |
The textbook of a first-year Scheme course, such as SICP or HTDP,
would then *not* be considered a "manual", so there is no policy
violation in recommending SICP on g.e.h.
I don't know what HTDP refers to. I would agree that SICP is
outside the scope of documentation. An introduction to Scheme
would definitely be documentation, though.
- Re: Futile bug reports?, (continued)
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/16
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Alan Mackenzie, 2001/08/16
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Ryan Yeske, 2001/08/16
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Alan Mackenzie, 2001/08/17
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/17
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/17
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/17
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/17
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/19
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/19
- Re: Futile bug reports?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/21
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/22
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/22
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/23
- Re: Futile bug reports?, David desJardins, 2001/08/24
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/24
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kevin Gallagher, 2001/08/26
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/26
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/10
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Alan Mackenzie, 2001/08/16