Using then this markup for the preparation of localization is a different step which comes after.
Some will say "Wow, you are moving too fast! You could call this kind of information more in general "localization notes", because not the translator, but other people who participate in localization may need it. You are talking about "localization" all the time.
I know all sorts of stuff about URIs and Web Architecture, but I have a lot to learn about how bank web sites are designed and built before URIs work like I want them to. Let's try and clarify a few points. And no way to have an overview of the quality checking of the web page.
But too often, that process just doesn't converge. If there is only one possibility, the server may decide for you, but if someone added index. If a certification program was launched at in the future, it would certainly modify the whole Web ecosystem.
Using then this markup for the preparation of localization is a different step which comes after.
But one of the oldest one, is via graphical editors using the PUT method. Its purpose is to identify the real URI of the entity served.
It remains a closed, a one-way system. But too often, that process just doesn't converge.
On the basis of this test case and its implementation, the specification prose will be written.
These questions take on additional weight when considered with respect to the security or the safety of the product in question.
If a certification program was launched at in the future, it would certainly modify the whole Web ecosystem.
We require validation tools that work and are kept up to date. And even better than those, which were mostly developed after-the-fact at the errata stage, are the hundreds of RDF and OWL tests that were developed concurrent with the Recommendations.
How much do we eat our own dog food?
This leads to several issues for editing clients, but also for servers. If a test case for a particular feature is difficult to conceive, it often means that the feature is too complex, or that the prose describing the feature is too ambiguous.
What software is secure?
For example, somebody who checks the whole text about existing names of books. Its purpose is to identify the real URI of the entity served. At the time of the publication, it was mentionned that a schema could be useful to help implementers to use it in their tools. But too often, that process just doesn't converge.
Small closed communities are a lot easier to manage.
Certification is a legal process between two parties.
And all this can be done in an open field, and start an open debate.