[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gettext] [bug #43404] gl_locale_name_default() thread issues on
From: |
Daiki Ueno |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gettext] [bug #43404] gl_locale_name_default() thread issues on OS X |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:06:36 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Forwarding to the mailing lists to get more feedback; the original
report can be found at <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43404>.
(I've changed the tracker configuration so that all reports will be sent
to the mailing list hereafter.)
Peter Eisentraut <address@hidden> writes:
> Something in libintl calls setlocale(), which calls gl_locale_name_default(),
> which calls CFLocaleCopyCurrent() on OS X. Our analysis shows that
> CFLocaleCopyCurrent() spins up an additional thread, which causes all kinds of
> chaos in signal handlers and forked processes. Here is the full analysis:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/address@hidden
>
> Clearly, this is a somewhat special application, compared to all the
> single-threaded, single-process programs out there, but if adding gettext
> support to a server causes it to crash in random ways, that doesn't seem
> nice.
>
> The original change in gettext/libintl is
> d4fd77b3f57a386b63083a7246ae5808510ac072.
>
> Later in the above thread, a patch is proposed to move the Core Foundation
> calls into a subprocess, which you might be interested in.
That sounds like an interesting idea. Perhaps gl_locale_name_default
could use the pipe/fork trick around the Core Foundation calls, for
single-threaded consumer (using pthread_is_threaded_np). Is this kind
of change acceptable in Gnulib?
By the way, the issue reminds me of:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2013-11/msg00020.html
though it is a different (multi-threaded consumer) case.
Thanks,
--
Daiki Ueno
- Re: [bug-gettext] [bug #43404] gl_locale_name_default() thread issues on OS X,
Daiki Ueno <=