bug-gawk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Grammar issues


From: Wolfgang Laun
Subject: Re: Grammar issues
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:12:53 +0200

Warning: English is not my first language.

On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 at 23:29, Alan Welsh via Bug reports only for gawk. <
bug-gawk@gnu.org> wrote:

>
> "Assigning a timeout value prevents read operations from blocking
> indefinitely.
>
> BUT,
>
> The verb "block" cannot be used intransitively here,
>

Webster's appears to agree with you,
BUT
Googling for "concurrency" or "how to prevent blocking" finds a lot of
places where "to block", gerund or otherwise, is indeed used
intransitively. Examples can be found in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-blocking_algorithm. I've been reading the
English literature on concurrency since 1974 and have grown accustomed to
this arguably sloppy usage. Perhaps you could be a wee bit more tolerant in
this case?

Cheers
Wolfgang


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]