Re: 32-bit profiling counts?

[Andrew J. Schorr]

On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:17:04PM -0600, arnold@skeeve.com wrote:
> > Also, here's another thought: if you're going to dive in and make this
> > change, might it be safer to apply the attached patch?
> > This way, we leave the other uses of dl unchanged and switch
> > only exec_count to use long long. I'm not sure it matters, but it seems
> > a bit less risky. And why incur a potential performance hit for the
> > other uses of dl? It passes "make check" and "make valgrind".
> 
> Did that.  Everything pushed.

Super. Thanks. I should have suggested this earlier, but since that ldl
union field is now dedicated to exec_count, would it make sense to make
it unsigned?

Regards,
Andy